It’s especially impressive when you consider that the PS3 version offered two rendering options – 720p with anti-aliasing and 1080p with no anti-aliasing. This is compared to the PS3 version which saw a fair number of drops. Considering the sizable leap in performance between both platforms, what kind of visual differences could one look forward to? For that matter, how did the HD Remaster compare to the PS2 versions of yore? Let’s find out.įirst the good news: The PlayStation 4 indeed offers a significant bump in performance to Final Fantasy X/X-2 HD Remaster with the frame rate staying stable at 30 FPS. However, it’s interesting to note that the HD Remaster for both titles was done on the PlayStation 3 first. Both games are famous (and infamous) for trying new things and Square Enix’s Final Fantasy X/X-2 HD Remaster sought to bring them to a contemporary audience with the usual amount of graphical polishes and increased resolution. The latter took the series into more light-hearted, questing territory while expanding the same universe, something which went against the grain of Final Fantasy itself. The former paved the way for innovation on the PlayStation, introducing advancements in motion capture and facial animation along with voice acting for the first time in the series. Of all the Final Fantasy titles released in the past several decades, Final Fantasy X and its sequel Final Fantasy X-2 stick out as some of the most significant and yet, most unorthodox titles in the series.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |